Culture: शरमाना

Culture: शरमाना


'थंडर, उत्तम' नाग हम्मादी पुस्तकालय मैं हूँ ह्त्त्प://डी.अर्मोरी.कॉम/पुब/उसेर/लीवित्त/ग्नोसिस/ठुंदर.हटमल से ध्यान ... वित्हीं. इहूँ ... इस नातुरेस की. मैं आत्माओं की रचना कर रहा हूँ. मैं नियंत्रण और अनियन्त्रणीय रहा हूँ. मैं संघ और विघटन कर रहा हूँ. मैं और स्थायी हूँ मैं हूँ के घुला देनेवाला. मैं एक से नीचे रहा हूँ, और वे मुझे करने के लिए आते हैं. मैंने निर्णय और बरी कर रहा हूँ. मैं, मैं, और पाप की जड़ पापमुक्त हूँ मुझ से व्युत्पन्न. जो मैं सबको और जो ग्रास्पेद नहीं किया जा सकता है इस भाषण को प्राप्य है जो सुन रहा हूँ. मैं एक हूँ जो बात नहीं है, गूंगा और महान शब्द मेरे भीड़ है. (यह सरस्वती) की देवी माँ शुरुआत सभी देवताओं और देवी और सभी टोने के (माँ) / जादू उन लोगों के साथ संपर्क में था. भारत में देवी माँ दुर्गा और काली का रूप ले लेता है. इस योगिस आजीविका या शरमाना या साधु, भारत, (ईश्वर आग अग्नि देवता की पूजा बुलाया 'इस क्नोवेर जिनकी जीभ देवी काली विनाश की देवी, एक द्विलिंग देवता-देवी) प्राचीन अश्शूर / फारस से आयातित है, और कश्शाफ (टोना) की जादुई इन्कान्ताशन्स के अभ्यास में लगे हुए है और अन्य लोगों के बीच (नागिन काला जादू) प्रथाओं, नाचाश है प्राचीन मेसोपोटामिया, जो प्राचीन अश्शूर के माध्यम से अपने रास्ते वहाँ बनाया की / फारस के रूप में अच्छी तरह से. इस टोना और जादू और मनोगत प्रथाओं के साथ उसमें भगवान द्वारा देउतेरोनोमी १८:१०, ११में निंदा कर रहे हैं सूचीबद्ध के आराम के साथ यह अजीब आग (हिब्रू: एश). यह पहली दत में सूचीबद्ध है: के अंतिम घृणा १८:१०:न तो करते हैं वहाँ आप किसी भी एक के बीच में है कि उसका बेटा या बेटी एक्स्पिअते चाहिए पाया जा, उन्हें आग के माध्यम से पारित करने के लिए .... (द्रव) वह अंतिम घृणा आग बलिदान द्वारा मानव त्याग है (अग्नि में) करने के लिए झूठे देवताओं / गिर आत्माओं से अलौकिक शक्ति प्राप्त की आशा में देवी, और अपोस्ताते दूत, शैतान - शैतान, जैसा कि बाकी के मुख्य (द्रव) टोना / जादू और ज्योतिष शुरू किया, के बाद बाढ़ की दुनिया है, चल्देया सुमेरिया अस्स्य्रो -कसदियों मेसोपोटामिया में. फिर यहूदी यिस्रैल में यहूदियों की तैयारी में है, वे अपने अपने मलऊन मंदिर इन्कुल्कातेद के लिए आशा की जा रही है.









"Thunder, Perfect Mind" from the Nag Hammadi Library



http://d.armory.com/pub/user/leavitt/gnosis/thunder.html



I am ... within.I am ...of the natures.



I am the creation of the spirits.



I am control and the uncontrollable.



I am the union and the dissolution.



I am the abiding and I am the dissolving.



I am the one below, and they come up to me.



I am the judgement and the acquittal.



I, I am sinless, and the root of sin derives from me.



I am the hearing which is attainable to everyone and the speech which cannot be grasped.



I am a mute who does not speak, and great is my multitude of words. ( this is Sarasvati)



The Mother Goddess was the beginning (the mother) of all the gods and goddesses and all sorcery /magic in connection with them.



In India the mother goddess is Durga and takes the form of Kali.



The yogis, ajivika or sramana or sadhu, of India, worshipped the fire god Agni (the god called "The Knower" whose tongue is the goddess Kali the goddess of destruction, a hermaphrodite god-goddess) imported from ancient Assyria/Persia, and engaged in the practice of the magical incantations of the kashshaph (sorcery) and nachash (serpent black magic) practices, amongst others, of ancient Mesopotamia, which made their way there through ancient Assyria/Persia as well. This strange fire (Hebrew: esh) with the sorcery and magic and rest of the occult practices listed together therein are condemned by God in Deuteronomy 18:10, 11.



The final abomination of this is listed first in Dt:18:10: Neither let there be found among you any one that shall expiate his son or daughter, making them to pass through the fire.... (DRV)



That final abomination is human sacrifice by fire sacrifice (as in Agni) to false gods/goddesses in the hope of gaining preternatural power from fallen spirits; the apostate angel, Satan - the devil, is the chief fallen spirit of the rest and who Jesus Christ said was a murderer and a liar from the beginning. Jn:8:44: You are of your father the devil: and the desires of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning: and he stood not in the truth, because truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof. (DRV)



Sorcery/magic and astrology began, in the post flood world, in Chaldaea Sumeria Assyro-Babylonian Mesopotamia.


It always, I mean always, includes the murder of children. That was the most rampant sin from the time of the fallen angels coming into the daughters of Adam (notice it is Adam again, not the daughters of Eve, it is Adam’s sin that got us where we are).



Gn:6:

1 ¶ And after that men began to be multiplied upon the earth, and daughters were born to them,

2 The sons of God seeing the daughters of Adam, that they were fair, took to themselves wives of all which they chose.

3 ¶ And God said: My spirit shall not remain in man for ever, because he is flesh, and his days shall be a hundred and twenty years.

4 ¶ Now giants were upon the earth in those days. For after the sons of God [the fallen angels] went in to the daughters of Adam, and they brought forth children, these are the mighty men of old, men of renown. [the pre-flood nephilim, not human but with the souls of demons]

5 And God seeing that the wickedness of men was great on the earth, and that all the thought of their heart was bent upon evil at all times,

6 ¶ It repented him that he had made man on the earth. And being touched inwardly with sorrow of heart,

7 He said: I will destroy man, whom I have created, from the face of the earth, from man even to beasts, from the creeping thing even to the fowls of the air, for it repenteth me that I have made them.

8 ¶ But Noe found grace before the Lord.



And then comes the flood.





It was also the most rampant sin from the time after the flood until now. Child murder is the absolute most heinous murder there is. Abortion and infanticide are all child murder.



Alan Guttmacher did more than anyone (including Margaret Sanger) to promote the massive abortion agenda throughout the world. Human Life International reports that women abortion providers are being trained to offer the little murdered babies to mother Gaia via witchcraft. This is the sin of conjuring power from Satan by using idols and false goddesses and gods (Hercules-Melkart of Carthage is an ancient example) as mediums to channel Satan’s trap of diabolic power into oneself by the triple sin of 1) murder, 2) disobeying God by worship of Satan and 3) idolatry-sorcery.





Do you think the demon goddess Lilith will have any appreciable following in Israel amongst Israeli women? Answer: Most assuredly. Obviously the demon goddess Moloch has returned to the center of Israeli worship and that for export to Africa and the U.S., see the following:



Alan Guttmacher Institute Mission: "The Institute's mission is to protect the reproductive choices of all women and men in the United States and throughout the world. It is to support their ability to obtain the information and services needed to achieve their full human rights, safeguard their health and exercise their individual responsibilities in regard to sexual behavior and relationships, reproduction and family formation."



From Mary Meehan’s "The Road to Abortion" Copyright © 1998, 1999 & 2002 by Mary Meehan. In 1966 Dr. Alan Guttmacher, apparently trying to be witty, wrote from Africa to a U.S. colleague: "My trip has been great. I believe I converted the Jews in Israel and now I am working on the pigmented savages." This private comment from Guttmacher (who was Jewish, but not observant) came soon after his Planned Parenthood group gave an award to the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.(32)



32. William H. Draper, Jr., to P. A. Gorman, [8 or 11] Sept. 1967, Guttmacher Papers; Alan F. Guttmacher to Frank Notestein, 13 June 1966, PPFA (II), box 125; and Congressional Record (10 May 1966), vol. 112, part 8, 10164-10165. In his statement accepting the Margaret Sanger Award, Dr. King praised Sanger and family planning and spoke of "the modern plague of overpopulation." Unfortunately, he seemed unaware of the eugenics connections of Sanger and of population control in general. Ibid.



It is being inculcated again in Zionist Yisrael by the Jews in preparation, they hope, for their damned temple and the worship of Satan in that temple so that the Jews can gain the power from Satan to rule the world.


It is a hermetic principle of the Jews’ Talmudic Satanic Lurianic Cabalism that Satan is to be worshipped and that in this illuminist sense especially they, the Jews, will gain power over the whole world from their father who is Satan. The utter depths of Satanic depravity and sorcery is the slaughter of children and offering them to Satan. The so-called “blood libel” attached to Jews throughout the centuries is absolute fact. The center today of child snuff porn and every other form of diabolic depravity is the Jews’ Jerusalem. Via the Jews’ planning it on purpose, even using the Christian concept of the Antichrist as a guide to go by, this is by the Jews’ design leading up to the Antichrist in the rebuilt temple in Jerusalem, there to force all those who will apostasize from the true God to worship the Antichrist (the Dajjal) and his henchmen the Jews. To do so is eternal damnation.



Jan. 2, 2006 St. Sylvester Bishop of Rome



this brief excerpt tells what happened when Jews opposed the Church with sorcery (see above for the origin of sorcery):



...During the reign of the emperor St. Constantine the Great the Jews arranged a public debate to determine which faith was true.... St. Sylvester spoke for the Christians, and the Jews had one hundred and twenty learned rabbis led by Zambres, a magician and sorcerer.... St. Sylvester convincingly demonstrated that all the prophets foretold the birth of Jesus Christ from the all-pure Virgin, and also His voluntary suffering and death for the redemption of the fallen race of mankind, and His glorious Resurrection.



The saint was declared the victor in the debate. Then Zambres tried to resort to sorcery, but the saint obstructed the evil by calling on the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. Zambres and the other Jews came to believe in Jesus Christ, and they asked to be baptized.





.... End of Excerpt.

Right to Life: Right to Life: Culture: Culture: Abortion is Murder

Right to Life: Right to Life: Culture: Culture: Abortion is Murder


Right to Life: Culture: Culture: Abortion is Murder

ABORTION VIOLATES GOD'S LAW WHICH IS EVIL FROM THE DEVIL WHOSE CHIEF PROPONENT IN AMERICA AND THE WORLD IS GUTTMACHER AND THE INSTITUTE FOUNDED BY HIM.

Culture: Culture: Abortion is Murder

Culture: Abortion is Murder

We posted this on Mother's Day for the Islamic Cultures of the Middle East and everywhere and we repeat it here on the West's Mother's Day, and yes I told my Mother I love her and wished her a happy and blessed Mother's Day.

Until you defend the right to life of the unborn, the way that Jesus Christ did and the way that Muhammad did and the way that Mother Teresa did, please don't tell the world how concerned you are for the rights of others. In other words, there are NO exceptions, all babies from the moment of conception have the absolute, utter and complete right to life that God gives them. Amen.

The genocide against the babies outweighs any other. One half BILLION (Billion with "B") murdered by abortion and abortafacient (the Pill, it ALWAYS induces abortion of just conceived babies).




Ex:20:13:
13 Thou shalt not kill. (DRV)
Dt:18:9, 10:
9 ¶ When thou art come into the land which the Lord thy God shall give thee, beware lest thou have a mind to imitate the abominations of those nations.
10 Neither let there be found among you any one that shall expiate his son or daughter, making them to pass through the fire: or that consulteth soothsayers, or observeth dreams and omens, neither let there be any wizard, (DRV)
Dt:18:10 "... expiate his son or daughter, making them to pass through the fire..." Refers to the practice of murdering a live infant by fire to the pagan goddess Moloch. Today the same thing, murder by burning, is saline abortion. There is also murder by sucking the brains out of the live infant, this is referred to as partial birth abortion. There is also murder by abortafacient at or very close to the moment of conception, this is referred to as “the pill” or a patch or whatever method of ingesting the abortafacient. There hasn’t been a “pill” that doesn’t do this for 40 years.
ALL ABORTION IS OBVIOUSLY MURDER MOST EVIL


The Didache
TEACHING of the TWELVE APOSTLES

Chap. II.

1. And the second commandment of the Teaching is:
2. Thou shalt not kill. Thou shalt not commit adultery; thou shalt not corrupt boys; thou shalt not commit fornication. Thou shalt not steal. Thou shalt not use witchcraft; thou shalt not practice sorcery. Thou shalt not procure abortion, nor shalt thou kill the new-born child. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's goods.
3. Thou shalt not forswear thyself (swear falsely). Thou shalt not bear false witness. Thou shalt not speak evil; thou shalt not bear malice.
4. Thou shalt not be double-minded nor double-tongued; for duplicity of tongue is a snare of death.
5. Thy speech shall not be false, nor vain, but fulfilled by deed.
6. Thou shalt not be covetous, nor rapacious, nor a hypocrite, nor malignant, nor haughty. Thou shalt not take evil counsel against thy neighbor.
7. Thou shalt not hate any one, but some thou shalt rebuke and for some thou shalt pray, and some thou shalt love above thine own soul (or, life).


Matthew 18

1 ¶ At that hour the disciples came to Jesus, saying: Who, thinkest thou, is the greater in the kingdom of heaven?
2 And Jesus, calling unto him a little child, set him in the midst of them.
3 And said: amen I say to you, unless you be converted, and become as little children, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.
4 Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, he is the greater in the kingdom of heaven.
5 And he that shall receive one such little child in my name, receiveth me.
6 But he that shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone should be hanged about his neck, and that he should be drowned in the depth of the sea.
7 ¶ Woe to the world because of scandals. For it must needs be that scandals come: but nevertheless woe to that man by whom the scandal cometh.
8 And if thy hand, or thy foot, scandalize thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee. It is better for thee to go into life maimed or lame, than having two hands or two feet, to be cast into everlasting fire.
9 And if thy eye scandalize thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee. It is better for thee having one eye to enter into life, than having two eyes to be cast into hell fire.
10 See that you despise not one of these little ones: for I say to you, that their angels in heaven always see the face of my Father who is in heaven.
11 For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost.
12 What think you? If a man have an hundred sheep, and one of them should go astray: doth he not leave the ninety-nine in the mountains, and goeth to seek that which is gone astray?
13 And if it so be that he find it: Amen I say to you, he rejoiceth more for that, than for the ninety-nine that went not astray.
14 Even so it is not the will of your Father, who is in heaven, that one of these little ones should perish.
(DRV)

From Mary Meehan’s "The Road to Abortion" Copyright © 1998, 1999 & 2002 by Mary Meehan. In 1966 Dr. Alan Guttmacher, apparently trying to be witty, wrote from Africa to a U.S. colleague: "My trip has been great. I believe I converted the Jews in Israel and now I am working on the pigmented savages." This private comment from Guttmacher (who was Jewish, but not observant) came soon after his Planned Parenthood group gave an award to the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.(32)
32. William H. Draper, Jr., to P. A. Gorman, [8 or 11] Sept. 1967, Guttmacher Papers; Alan F. Guttmacher to Frank Notestein, 13 June 1966, PPFA (II), box 125; and Congressional Record (10 May 1966), vol. 112, part 8, 10164-10165. In his statement accepting the Margaret Sanger Award, Dr. King praised Sanger and family planning and spoke of "the modern plague of overpopulation." Unfortunately, he seemed unaware of the eugenics connections of Sanger and of population control in general. Ibid.

Also see: http://www.angelfire.com/mo/baha/king.html
Dr. King did in fact receive the Margaret Sanger Award in 1966. But it is also a fact that in 1966, Planned Parenthood was still (at least publicly) anti-abortion.

Alan Guttmacher Institute Mission: "The Institute's mission is to protect the reproductive choices of all women and men in the United States and throughout the world. It is to support their ability to obtain the information and services needed to achieve their full human rights, safeguard their health and exercise their individual responsibilities in regard to sexual behavior and relationships, reproduction and family formation."

Alan Guttmacher (1898-1974), a Jew, did more to cause the widespread use of abortion to murder babies, especially gentile babies, than anyone else, including Margaret Sanger.

One who followed in the footsteps of Guttmacher, Dr. Bernard Nathanson (born 1926). Dr. Nathanson repented of his genocide against babies.

CONFESSION OF AN EX-ABORTIONIST
By Dr. Bernard Nathanson

I am personally responsible for 75,000 abortions. This legitimises my credentials to speak to you with some authority on the issue. I was one of the founders of the National Association for the Repeal of the Abortion Laws (NARAL) in the U.S. in 1968. A truthful poll of opinion then would have found that most Americans were against permissive abortion. Yet within five years we had convinced the U.S. Supreme Court to issue the decision which legalised abortion throughout America in 1973 and produced virtual abortion on demand up to birth. How did we do this? It is important to understand the tactics involved because these tactics have been used throughout the western world with one permutation or another, in order to change abortion law.

THE FIRST KEY TACTIC WAS TO CAPTURE THE MEDIA

We persuaded the media that the cause of permissive abortion was a liberal enlightened, sophisticated one. Knowing that if a true poll were taken, we would be soundly defeated, we simply fabricated the results of fictional polls. We announced to the media that we had taken polls and that 60% of Americans were in favour of permissive abortion. This is the tactic of the self-fulfilling lie. Few people care to be in the minority. We aroused enough sympathy to sell our program of permissive abortion by fabricating the number of illegal abortions done annually in the U.S. The actual figure was approaching 100,000 but the figure we gave to the media repeatedly was 1,000,000. Repeating the big lie often enough convinces the public. The number of women dying from illegal abortions was around 200-250 annually. The figure we constantly fed to the media was 10,000. These false figures took root in the consciousness of Americans convincing many that we needed to crack the abortion law. Another myth we fed to the public through the media was that legalising abortion would only mean that the abortions taking place illegally would then be done legally. In fact, of course, abortion is now being used as a primary method of birth control in the U.S. and the annual number of abortions has increased by 1500% since legalisation.

THE SECOND KEY TACTIC WAS TO PLAY THE CATHOLIC CARD

We systematically vilified the Catholic Church and its "socially backward ideas" and picked on the Catholic hierarchy as the villain in opposing abortion. This theme was played endlessly. We fed the media such lies as "we all know that opposition to abortion comes from the hierarchy and not from most Catholics" and "Polls prove time and again that most Catholics want abortion law reform". And the media drum-fired all this into the American people, persuading them that anyone opposing permissive abortion must be under the influence of the Catholic hierarchy and that Catholics in favour of abortion are enlightened and forward-looking. An inference of this tactic was that there were no non-Catholic groups opposing abortion. The fact that other Christian as well as non-Christian religions were {and still are) monolithically opposed to abortion was constantly suppressed, along with pro-life atheists' opinions.

THE THIRD KEY TACTIC WAS THE DENIGRATION AND SUPPRESSION OF ALL SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE THAT LIFE BEGINS AT CONCEPTION

I am often asked what made me change my mind. How did I change from prominent abortionist to pro-life advocate? In 1973, I became director of obstetrics of a large hospital in New York City and had to set up a prenatal research unit, just at the start of a great new technology which we now use every day to study the foetus in the womb. A favourite pro- abortion tactic is to insist that the definition of when life begins is impossible; that the question is a theological or moral or philosophical one, anything but a scientific one. Foetology makes it undeniably evident that life begins at conception and requires all the protection and safeguards that any of us enjoy. Why, you may well ask, do some American doctors who are privy to the findings of foetology, discredit themselves by carrying out abortions? Simple arithmetic at $300 a time, 1.55 million abortions means an industry generating $500,000,000 annually, of which most goes into the pocket of the physician doing the abortion. It is clear that permissive abortion is purposeful destruction of what is undeniably human life. It is an impermissible act of deadly violence. One must concede that unplanned pregnancy is a wrenchingly difficult dilemma, but to look for its solution in a deliberate act of destruction is to trash the vast resourcefulness of human ingenuity, and to surrender the public weal to the classic utilitarian answer to social problems.

AS A SCIENTIST I KNOW, NOT BELIEVE, KNOW THAT HUMAN LIFE BEGINS AT CONCEPTION

Although I am not a formal religionist, I believe with all my heart that there is a divinity of existence which commands us to declare a final and irreversible halt to this infinitely sad and shameful crime against humanity.


Dr. Bernard Nathanson's film Silent Scream, real abortion, the real truth, watch it.





Dr. Nathanson’s videos at: The Silent Scream



Those who follow in the footsteps of Guttmacher -
This picture is of a murderer who is by its own admission as to its crimes the definition of a soulless pig and not a human being.

Those who do NOT repent:

Hell, by the just judgment of God awaits.

See:

ANTIGOD 




ANTILIFE

Abortion is murder

Abortion is murder. The legalisms are that one may commit this murder when a doctor is paid his fee for that "pound of flesh." (There is no NO difference between Shylock and abortion doctors, especially beginning with Alan Guttmacher and the Guttmacher Institute, and their murderess client baby murdering Mothers and Cain who killed Abel.) All copyrighted sources are quoted and used for comment and education in accord with the nonprofit provisions of: Title 17 U.S.C., Section 107 and in accordance with "Fair Use." source for below: http://ypdcrime.com/penal.law/article125.htm

New York Laws

Laws of New York - This site contains the full online searchable text of the New York Penal Law, the New York Criminal Procedure Law, the New York Vehicle & Traffic Law and some of theNew York Alcoholic Beverage Control Laws.

Article 125 - NY Penal Law

HOMICIDE, ABORTION AND RELATED OFFENSES
125.00 Homicide defined.
125.05 Homicide, abortion and related offenses; definitions of terms.
125.10 Criminally negligent homicide.
125.11 Aggravated criminally negligent homicide.
125.12 Vehicular manslaughter in the second degree.
125.13 Vehicular manslaughter in the first degree.
125.14 Aggravated vehicular homicide.
125.15 Manslaughter in the second degree.
125.20 Manslaughter in the first degree.
125.21 Aggravated manslaughter in the second degree.
125.22 Aggravated manslaughter in the first degree.
125.25 Murder in the second degree.
125.26 Aggravated murder.
125.27 Murder in the first degree.
125.40 Abortion in the second degree.
125.45 Abortion in the first degree.
125.50 Self-abortion in the second degree.
125.55 Self-abortion in the first degree.
125.60 Issuing abortional articles.

S 125.00 Homicide defined.
  Homicide means conduct which causes the death of a person or an unborn
child with which a female has been pregnant for more than twenty-four
weeks under circumstances constituting murder, manslaughter in the first
degree, manslaughter in the second degree, criminally negligent
homicide, abortion in the first degree or self-abortion in the first
degree.


S 125.05 Homicide, abortion and related offenses; definitions of terms.
  The following definitions are applicable to this article:
  1. "Person," when referring to the victim of a homicide, means a human
being who has been born and is alive.
  2. "Abortional act" means an act committed upon or with respect to a
female, whether by another person or by the female herself, whether she
is pregnant or not, whether directly upon her body or by the
administering, taking or prescription of drugs or in any other manner,
with intent to cause a miscarriage of such female.
  3. "Justifiable abortional act." An abortional act is justifiable when
committed upon a female with her consent by a duly licensed physician
acting (a) under a reasonable belief that such is necessary to preserve
her life, or, (b) within twenty-four weeks from the commencement of her
pregnancy. A pregnant female`s commission of an abortional act upon
herself is justifiable when she acts upon the advice of a duly licensed
physician (1) that such act is necessary to preserve her life, or, (2)
within twenty-four weeks from the commencement of her pregnancy. The
submission by a female to an abortional act is justifiable when she
believes that it is being committed by a duly licensed physician, acting
under a reasonable belief that such act is necessary to preserve her
life, or, within twenty-four weeks from the commencement of her
pregnancy.

S 125.10 Criminally negligent homicide.
  A person is guilty of criminally negligent homicide when, with
criminal negligence, he causes the death of another person.
  Criminally negligent homicide is a class E felony.

S 125.11 Aggravated criminally negligent homicide.
  A  person  is guilty of aggravated criminally negligent homicide when,
with criminal negligence, he or she causes the death of a police officer
or peace officer where such officer was in the course of performing  his
or  her official duties and the defendant knew or reasonably should have
known that such victim was a police officer or peace officer.
  Aggravated criminally negligent homicide is a class C felony.

S 125.12 Vehicular manslaughter in the second degree.
  A person is guilty of vehicular manslaughter in the second degree when
  he or she causes the death of another person, and either:
    (1)  operates  a motor vehicle in violation of subdivision two, three,
  four or four-a of section eleven hundred ninety-two of the  vehicle  and
  traffic  law  or  operates  a  vessel  or  public vessel in violation of
  paragraph  (b),  (c),  (d)  or  (e)  of  subdivision  two   of   section
  forty-nine-a of the navigation law, and as a result of such intoxication
  or  impairment  by  the  use  of a drug, or by the combined influence of
  drugs or of alcohol and any drug or drugs, operates such motor  vehicle,
  vessel  or public vessel in a manner that causes the death of such other
  person, or
    (2) operates a motor vehicle with a gross  vehicle  weight  rating  of
  more  than  eighteen  thousand  pounds  which  contains  flammable  gas,
  radioactive materials or explosives in violation of subdivision  one  of
  section  eleven  hundred  ninety-two of the vehicle and traffic law, and
  such flammable gas, radioactive materials or explosives is the cause  of
  such  death,  and  as a result of such impairment by the use of alcohol,
  operates such motor vehicle in a manner that causes the  death  of  such
  other person, or
    (3) operates a snowmobile in violation of paragraph (b), (c) or (d) of
  subdivision  one  of section 25.24 of the parks, recreation and historic
  preservation law or operates  an  all  terrain  vehicle  as  defined  in
  paragraph   (a)   of  subdivision  one  of  section  twenty-two  hundred
  eighty-one of the vehicle and traffic law in  violation  of  subdivision
  two,  three, four, or four-a of section eleven hundred ninety-two of the
  vehicle and traffic law,  and  as  a  result  of  such  intoxication  or
  impairment  by  the use of a drug, or by the combined influence of drugs
  or of alcohol and any drug or drugs, operates  such  snowmobile  or  all
  terrain vehicle in a manner that causes the death of such other person.
    If  it  is  established  that the person operating such motor vehicle,
  vessel, public vessel, snowmobile or all  terrain  vehicle  caused  such
  death  while unlawfully intoxicated or impaired by the use of alcohol or
  a drug, then there shall be a rebuttable presumption that, as  a  result
  of  such  intoxication or impairment by the use of alcohol or a drug, or
  by the combined influence of drugs or of alcohol and any drug or  drugs,
  such   person   operated  the  motor  vehicle,  vessel,  public  vessel,
  snowmobile or all terrain vehicle in a manner that caused such death, as
  required by this section.
  Vehicular manslaughter in the second degree is a class D felony.

S 125.13 Vehicular manslaughter in the first degree.
 A  person is guilty of vehicular manslaughter in the first degree when
  he or she commits the crime of  vehicular  manslaughter  in  the  second
  degree as defined in section 125.12 of this article, and either:
    (1)  commits  such  crime  while  operating a motor vehicle while such
  person has .18 of one per centum or more by weight of  alcohol  in  such
  person's  blood  as  shown  by chemical analysis of such person's blood,
  breath, urine or saliva made  pursuant  to  the  provisions  of  section
  eleven hundred ninety-four of the vehicle and traffic law;
    (2)  commits  such  crime while knowing or having reason to know that:
  (a) his or her license or his or her  privilege  of  operating  a  motor
  vehicle  in another state or his or her privilege of obtaining a license
  to operate a motor vehicle in another state is suspended or revoked  and
  such  suspension  or revocation is based upon a conviction in such other
  state for an offense which would, if committed in this state, constitute
  a  violation  of  any  of  the  provisions  of  section  eleven  hundred
  ninety-two  of the vehicle and traffic law; or (b) his or her license or
  his or her privilege of operating a motor vehicle in the state or his or
  her privilege of obtaining a license issued by the commissioner of motor
  vehicles is suspended or revoked and such suspension  or  revocation  is
  based  upon  either  a  refusal to submit to a chemical test pursuant to
  section eleven hundred ninety-four of the vehicle  and  traffic  law  or
  following  a  conviction  for  a  violation  of any of the provisions of
  section eleven hundred ninety-two of the vehicle and traffic law;
    (3) has previously been convicted of violating any of  the  provisions
  of  section  eleven  hundred  ninety-two  of the vehicle and traffic law
  within the preceding ten years, provided that, for the purposes of  this
  subdivision,  a  conviction  in  any  other state or jurisdiction for an
  offense which, if committed in this state, would constitute a  violation
  of  section  eleven  hundred  ninety-two of the vehicle and traffic law,
  shall be treated as a violation of such law;
    (4) causes the death of more than one other person;
    (5) has previously been convicted of violating any provision  of  this
  article  or  article  one  hundred  twenty  of  this title involving the
  operation of a motor vehicle, or was convicted in  any  other  state  or
  jurisdiction  of  an  offense involving the operation of a motor vehicle
  which, if committed in this state, would constitute a violation of  this
  article or article one hundred twenty of this title; or
    (6)  commits  such crime while operating a motor vehicle while a child
  who is fifteen years of age or less is a passenger in such motor vehicle
  and causes the death of such child.
    If it is established that the  person  operating  such  motor  vehicle
  caused  such death or deaths while unlawfully intoxicated or impaired by
  the use of alcohol or a drug, or by the combined influence of  drugs  or
  of  alcohol  and  any  drug  or  drugs, then there shall be a rebuttable
  presumption that, as a result of such intoxication or impairment by  the
  use  of  alcohol  or a drug, or by the combined influence of drugs or of
  alcohol and any drug or drugs, such person operated the motor vehicle in
  a manner that caused such death or deaths, as required by  this  section
  and section 125.12 of this article.
  Vehicular manslaughter in the first degree is a class C felony.

S 125.14  Aggravated vehicular homicide.
   A  person  is  guilty  of aggravated vehicular homicide when he or she
engages in reckless driving as defined by section twelve hundred  twelve
of  the  vehicle  and  traffic  law,  and commits the crime of vehicular
manslaughter in the second degree as defined in section 125.12  of  this
article, and either:
  (1)  commits  such  crimes  while operating a motor vehicle while such
person has .18 of one per centum or more by weight of  alcohol  in  such
person's  blood  as  shown  by chemical analysis of such person's blood,
breath, urine or saliva made  pursuant  to  the  provisions  of  section
eleven hundred ninety-four of the vehicle and traffic law;
  (2)  commits  such crimes while knowing or having reason to know that:
(a) his or her license or his or her  privilege  of  operating  a  motor
vehicle  in another state or his or her privilege of obtaining a license
to operate a motor vehicle in another state is suspended or revoked  and
such  suspension  or revocation is based upon a conviction in such other
state for an offense which would, if committed in this state, constitute
a  violation  of  any  of  the  provisions  of  section  eleven  hundred
ninety-two  of the vehicle and traffic law; or (b) his or her license or
his or her privilege of operating a motor vehicle in this state  or  his
or  her  privilege  of obtaining a license issued by the commissioner of
motor vehicles is suspended or revoked and such suspension or revocation
is based upon either a refusal to submit to a chemical test pursuant  to
section  eleven  hundred  ninety-four  of the vehicle and traffic law or
following a conviction for a violation  of  any  of  the  provisions  of
section eleven hundred ninety-two of the vehicle and traffic law;
  (3)  has  previously been convicted of violating any of the provisions
of section eleven hundred ninety-two of  the  vehicle  and  traffic  law
within  the preceding ten years, provided that, for the purposes of this
subdivision, a conviction in any other  state  or  jurisdiction  for  an
offense  which, if committed in this state, would constitute a violation
of section eleven hundred ninety-two of the  vehicle  and  traffic  law,
shall be treated as a violation of such law;
  (4) causes the death of more than one other person;
  (5)  causes the death of one person and the serious physical injury of
at least one other person;
  (6) has previously been convicted of violating any provision  of  this
article  or  article  one  hundred  twenty  of  this title involving the
operation of a motor vehicle, or was convicted in  any  other  state  or
jurisdiction  of  an  offense involving the operation of a motor vehicle
which, if committed in this state, would constitute a violation of  this
article or article one hundred twenty of this title; or
  (7)  commits  such crime while operating a motor vehicle while a child
who is fifteen years of age or less is a passenger in such motor vehicle
and causes the death of such child.
  If it is established that the  person  operating  such  motor  vehicle
caused  such death or deaths while unlawfully intoxicated or impaired by
the use of alcohol or a drug, or by the combined influence of  drugs  or
of  alcohol  and  any  drug  or  drugs, then there shall be a rebuttable
presumption that, as a result of such intoxication or impairment by  the
use  of  alcohol  or a drug, or by the combined influence of drugs or of
alcohol and any drug or drugs, such person operated the motor vehicle in
a manner that caused such death or deaths, as required by  this  section
and section 125.12 of this article.
   Aggravated vehicular homicide is a class B felony.

S 125.15 Manslaughter in the second degree.
  A person is guilty of manslaughter in the second degree when:
  1. He recklessly causes the death of another person; or
  2. He commits upon a female an abortional act which causes her death,
unless such abortional act is justifiable pursuant to subdivision three
of section 125.05; or
  3. He intentionally causes or aids another person to commit suicide.
  Manslaughter in the second degree is a class C felony.

S 125.20 Manslaughter in the first degree.
  A person is guilty of manslaughter in the first degree when:
  1. With intent to cause serious physical injury to another person, he
causes the death of such person or of a third person; or
  2. With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the
death of such person or of a third person under circumstances which do
not constitute murder because he acts under the influence of extreme
emotional disturbance, as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of
section 125.25. The fact that homicide was committed under the influence
of extreme emotional disturbance constitutes a mitigating circumstance
reducing murder to manslaughter in the first degree and need not be
proved in any prosecution initiated under this subdivision; or
  3. He commits upon a female pregnant for more than twenty-four weeks
an abortional act which causes her death, unless such abortional act is
justifiable pursuant to subdivision three of section 125.05; or
  4. Being eighteen years old or more and with intent to cause physical
injury to a person less than eleven years old, the defendant recklessly
engages in conduct which creates a grave risk of serious physical injury
to such person and thereby causes the death of such person.
  Manslaughter in the first degree is a class B felony.

S 125.21 Aggravated manslaughter in the second degree.
  A  person  is  guilty  of aggravated manslaughter in the second degree
when he or she recklessly causes the death of a police officer or  peace
officer  where  such  officer was in the course of performing his or her
official duties and the defendant knew or reasonably should  have  known
that such victim was a police officer or peace officer.
  Aggravated manslaughter in the second degree is a class C felony.

S 125.22 Aggravated manslaughter in the first degree.
  A  person  is  guilty  of  aggravated manslaughter in the first degree
when:
  1. with intent to cause serious physical injury to a police officer or
peace officer, where such officer was in the course of performing his or
her official duties and the defendant knew  or  reasonably  should  have
known  that  such  victim was a police officer or a peace officer, he or
she causes the death of such officer or another police officer or  peace
officer; or
  2.  with  intent  to  cause  the  death  of  a police officer or peace
officer, where such officer was in the course of performing his  or  her
official  duties  and the defendant knew or reasonably should have known
that such victim was a police officer or peace officer, he or she causes
the death of such officer or another police  officer  or  peace  officer
under  circumstances  which  do  not constitute murder because he or she
acts under the influence of extreme emotional disturbance, as defined in
paragraph (a) of subdivision  one  of  section  125.25.  The  fact  that
homicide   was  committed  under  the  influence  of  extreme  emotional
disturbance constitutes a mitigating  circumstance  reducing  murder  to
aggravated manslaughter in the first degree or manslaughter in the first
degree  and  need  not be proved in any prosecution initiated under this
subdivision.
  Aggravated manslaughter in the first degree is a class B felony.

S 125.25 Murder in the second degree.
  1.  With  intent  to  cause the death of another person, he causes the
death of  such  person  or  of  a  third  person;  except  that  in  any
prosecution under this subdivision, it is an affirmative defense that:
  (a)  The  defendant  acted  under  the  influence of extreme emotional
disturbance for which there was a reasonable explanation or excuse,  the
reasonableness  of  which  is  to  be determined from the viewpoint of a
person in the defendant's  situation  under  the  circumstances  as  the
defendant believed them to be. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall
constitute  a defense to a prosecution for, or preclude a conviction of,
manslaughter in the first degree or any other crime; or
  (b) The defendant's conduct consisted of causing  or  aiding,  without
the  use  of  duress  or  deception,  another  person to commit suicide.
Nothing contained in this paragraph shall  constitute  a  defense  to  a
prosecution for, or preclude a conviction of, manslaughter in the second
degree or any other crime; or
  2. Under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life,
he  recklessly engages in conduct which creates a grave risk of death to
another person, and thereby causes the death of another person; or
  3. Acting either alone or with one or more other persons,  he  commits
or  attempts to commit robbery, burglary, kidnapping, arson, rape in the
first degree, criminal sexual act in the first degree, sexual  abuse  in
the  first  degree, aggravated sexual abuse, escape in the first degree,
or escape in the second degree, and, in the course of and in furtherance
of  such  crime  or  of  immediate  flight  therefrom,  he,  or  another
participant,  if  there  be any, causes the death of a person other than
one of the participants; except  that  in  any  prosecution  under  this
subdivision,  in which the defendant was not the only participant in the
underlying crime, it is an affirmative defense that the defendant:
  (a) Did not commit the homicidal act or in any way  solicit,  request,
command, importune, cause or aid the commission thereof; and
  (b)  Was not armed with a deadly weapon, or any instrument, article or
substance readily capable of causing death or  serious  physical  injury
and  of  a  sort  not ordinarily carried in public places by law-abiding
persons; and
  (c) Had no reasonable ground to believe that any other participant was
armed with such a weapon, instrument, article or substance; and
  (d) Had no reasonable ground to believe  that  any  other  participant
intended  to  engage  in  conduct  likely  to result in death or serious
physical injury; or
  4. Under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life,
and being eighteen years old or more the defendant recklessly engages in
conduct which creates a grave risk of serious physical injury  or  death
to  another  person  less  than  eleven years old and thereby causes the
death of such person; or
  5. Being eighteen years old or more, while in the course of committing
rape in the first, second or third degree, criminal sexual  act  in  the
first,  second  or  third  degree,  sexual  abuse  in  the first degree,
aggravated sexual abuse in the first, second, third or fourth degree, or
incest in the first, second or third degree, against a person less  than
fourteen  years  old,  he  or she intentionally causes the death of such
person.
  Murder in the second degree is a class A-I felony.

S 125.26 Aggravated murder.
  A person is guilty of aggravated murder when:
  1.  With intent to cause the death of another person, he or she causes
the death of such person,  or  of  a  third  person  who  was  a  person
described  in  subparagraph  (i), (ii) or (iii) of paragraph (a) of this
subdivision engaged at  the  time  of  the  killing  in  the  course  of
performing his or her official duties; and
  (a) Either:
  (i) the intended victim was a police officer as defined in subdivision
thirty-four of section 1.20 of the criminal procedure law who was at the
time  of  the  killing  engaged  in  the course of performing his or her
official duties, and the defendant knew or reasonably should have  known
that the victim was a police officer; or
  (ii) the intended victim was a peace officer as defined in paragraph a
of  subdivision  twenty-one,  subdivision  twenty-three,  twenty-four or
sixty-two (employees of the division for youth) of section 2.10  of  the
criminal procedure law who was at the time of the killing engaged in the
course  of performing his or her official duties, and the defendant knew
or reasonably should have known that the victim  was  such  a  uniformed
court  officer,  parole  officer,  probation officer, or employee of the
division for youth; or
  (iii) the intended victim was an  employee  of  a  state  correctional
institution  or  was  an  employee  of  a local correctional facility as
defined in subdivision two of section forty of the correction  law,  who
was  at  the time of the killing engaged in the course of performing his
or her official duties, and the defendant knew or reasonably should have
known  that  the  victim  was  an  employee  of  a  state   correctional
institution or a local correctional facility; and
  (b)  The defendant was more than eighteen years old at the time of the
commission of the crime; or
  2. (a) With intent to cause the death of a person less  than  fourteen
years  old, he or she causes the death of such person, and the defendant
acted in an especially cruel and wanton manner pursuant to a  course  of
conduct intended to inflict and inflicting torture upon the victim prior
to  the victim's death. As used in this subdivision, "torture" means the
intentional and depraved infliction of extreme  physical  pain  that  is
separate  and  apart  from  the  pain  which  otherwise  would have been
associated with such cause of death; and
  (b) The defendant was more than eighteen years old at the time of  the
commission of the crime.
  3. In any prosecution under subdivision one or two of this section, it
is an affirmative defense that:
  (a)  The  defendant  acted  under  the  influence of extreme emotional
disturbance for which there was a reasonable explanation or excuse,  the
reasonableness  of  which  is  to  be determined from the viewpoint of a
person in the defendant's  situation  under  the  circumstances  as  the
defendant believed them to be. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall
constitute  a defense to a prosecution for, or preclude a conviction of,
aggravated manslaughter in the first degree, manslaughter in  the  first
degree or any other crime except murder in the second degree; or
  (b)  The  defendant's  conduct consisted of causing or aiding, without
the use of duress  or  deception,  another  person  to  commit  suicide.
Nothing  contained  in  this  paragraph  shall constitute a defense to a
prosecution for, or preclude a conviction of, aggravated manslaughter in
the second degree, manslaughter in the second degree or any other  crime
except murder in the second degree.
  Aggravated murder is a class A-I felony.

S 125.27 Murder in the first degree.
  A person is guilty of murder in the first degree when:
  1. With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the
death of such person or of a third person; and
  (a) Either:
  (i) the intended victim was a police officer as defined in subdivision
34 of section 1.20 of the criminal procedure law who was at the time of
the killing engaged in the course of performing his official duties, and
the defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the intended
victim was a police officer; or
  (ii) the intended victim was a peace officer as defined in paragraph a
of subdivision twenty-one, subdivision twenty-three, twenty-four or
sixty-two (employees of the division for youth) of section 2.10 of the
criminal procedure law who was at the time of the killing engaged in the
course of performing his official duties, and the defendant knew or
reasonably should have known that the intended victim was such a
uniformed court officer, parole officer, probation officer, or employee
of the division for youth; or
  (iii) the intended victim was an employee of a state correctional
institution or was an employee of a local correctional facility as
defined in subdivision two of section forty of the correction law, who
was at the time of the killing engaged in the course of performing his
official duties, and the defendant knew or reasonably should have known
that the intended victim was an employee of a state correctional
institution or a local correctional facility; or
  (iv) at the time of the commission of the killing, the defendant was
confined in a state correctional institution or was otherwise in custody
upon a sentence for the term of his natural life, or upon a sentence
commuted to one of natural life, or upon a sentence for an indeterminate
term the minimum of which was at least fifteen years and the maximum of
which was natural life, or at the time of the commission of the killing,
the defendant had escaped from such confinement or custody while serving
such a sentence and had not yet been returned to such confinement or
custody; or
  (v) the intended victim was a witness to a crime committed on a prior
occasion and the death was caused for the purpose of preventing the
intended victim`s testimony in any criminal action or proceeding whether
or not such action or proceeding had been commenced, or the intended
victim had previously testified in a criminal action or proceeding and
the killing was committed for the purpose of exacting retribution for
such prior testimony, or the intended victim was an immediate family
member of a witness to a crime committed on a prior occasion and the
killing was committed for the purpose of preventing or influencing the
testimony of such witness, or the intended victim was an immediate
family member of a witness who had previously testified in a criminal
action or proceeding and the killing was committed for the purpose of
exacting retribution upon such witness for such prior testimony.  As
used in this subparagraph "immediate family member" means a husband,
wife, father, mother, daughter, son, brother, sister, stepparent,
grandparent, stepchild or grandchild; or
  (vi) the defendant committed the killing or procured commission of the
killing pursuant to an agreement with a person other than the intended
victim to commit the same for the receipt, or in expectation of the
receipt, of anything of pecuniary value from a party to the agreement or
from a person other than the intended victim acting at the direction of
a party to such agreement; or
  (vii) the victim was killed while the defendant was in the  course  of
committing  or  attempting  to  commit  and  in  furtherance of robbery,
burglary in the first degree or second degree, kidnapping in  the  first
degree,  arson  in  the first degree or second degree, rape in the first
degree, criminal sexual act in the first degree,  sexual  abuse  in  the
first  degree,  aggravated sexual abuse in the first degree or escape in
the first degree, or in the  course  of  and  furtherance  of  immediate
flight after committing or attempting to commit any such crime or in the
course of and furtherance of immediate flight after attempting to commit
the  crime  of murder in the second degree; provided however, the victim
is not a participant in one of the aforementioned crimes  and,  provided
further  that,  unless  the  defendant's  criminal  liability under this
subparagraph is based upon the defendant having commanded another person
to cause the death of the victim or intended victim pursuant to  section
20.00  of  this  chapter,  this  subparagraph  shall not apply where the
defendant's criminal liability is based  upon  the  conduct  of  another
pursuant to section 20.00 of this chapter; or
  (viii) as part of the same criminal transaction, the defendant, with
intent to cause serious physical injury to or the death of an additional
person or persons, causes the death of an additional person or persons;
provided, however, the victim is not a participant in the criminal
transaction; or
  (ix) prior to committing the killing, the defendant had been convicted
of murder as defined in this section or section 125.25 of this article,
or had been convicted in another jurisdiction of an offense which, if
committed in this state, would constitute a violation of either of such
sections; or
  (x) the defendant acted in an especially cruel and wanton manner
pursuant to a course of conduct intended to inflict and inflicting
torture upon the victim prior to the victim`s death. As used in this
subparagraph, "torture" means the intentional and depraved infliction of
extreme physical pain; "depraved" means the defendant relished the
infliction of extreme physical pain upon the victim evidencing
debasement or perversion or that the defendant evidenced a sense of
pleasure in the infliction of extreme physical pain; or
  (xi) the defendant intentionally caused the death of two or more
additional persons within the state in separate criminal transactions
within a period of twenty-four months when committed in a similar
fashion or pursuant to a common scheme or plan; or
  (xii) the intended victim was a judge as defined in subdivision
twenty-three of section 1.20 of the criminal procedure law and the
defendant killed such victim because such victim was, at the time of the
killing, a judge; or
  (xiii) the victim was killed in furtherance of an act of terrorism, as
defined in paragraph (b) of subdivision one of section 490.05 of this
chapter; and
  (b) The defendant was more than eighteen years old at the time of the
commission of the crime.
  2. In any prosecution under subdivision one, it is an affirmative
defense that:
  (a) The defendant acted under the influence of extreme emotional
disturbance for which there was a reasonable explanation or excuse, the
reasonableness of which is to be determined from the viewpoint of a
person in the defendant`s situation under the circumstances as the
defendant believed them to be. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall
constitute a defense to a prosecution for, or preclude a conviction of,
manslaughter in the first degree or any other crime except murder in the
second degree; or
  (b) The defendant`s conduct consisted of causing or aiding, without
the use of duress or deception, another person to commit suicide.
Nothing contained in this paragraph shall constitute a defense to a
prosecution for, or preclude a conviction of, manslaughter in the second
degree or any other crime except murder in the second degree.
  Murder in the first degree is a class A-I felony.

S 125.40 Abortion in the second degree.
  A person is guilty of abortion in the second degree when he commits an
abortional act upon a female, unless such abortional act is justifiable
pursuant to subdivision three of section 125.05.
  Abortion in the second degree is a class E felony.

S 125.45 Abortion in the first degree.
  A person is guilty of abortion in the first degree when he commits
upon a female pregnant for more than twenty-four weeks an abortional act
which causes the miscarriage of such female, unless such abortional act
is justifiable pursuant to subdivision three of section 125.05.
  Abortion in the first degree is a class D felony.

S 125.50 Self-abortion in the second degree.
  A female is guilty of self-abortion in the second degree when, being
pregnant, she commits or submits to an abortional act upon herself,
unless such abortional act is justifiable pursuant to subdivision three
of section 125.05.
  Self-abortion in the second degree is a class B misdemeanor.

S 125.55 Self-abortion in the first degree.
  A female is guilty of self-abortion in the first degree when, being
pregnant for more than twenty-four weeks, she commits or submits to an
abortional act upon herself which causes her miscarriage, unless such
abortional act is justifiable pursuant to subdivision three of section
125.05.
  Self-abortion in the first degree is a class A misdemeanor.

S 125.60 Issuing abortional articles.
  A person is guilty of issuing abortional articles when he
manufactures, sells or delivers any instrument, article, medicine, drug
or substance with intent that the same be used in unlawfully procuring
the miscarriage of a female.
  Issuing abortional articles is a class B misdemeanor.