See: The Justice of God: Destruction of Babylon and all that are part of her.
There was a time when much of the SSPX represented real resistance to the Great Apostasy of Vatican II. That is entirely gone now.
Several points are absolutely important here.
1) The Marian apparitions are totally false and from the Devil.
Marian T. Horvat, Ph.D.
Book review of Peom of the Man-God by Maria Valtorta, 10 volumes, online edition
|A friend recently sent me an e-mail asking about Maria Valtorta |
and her Poem of the Man-God. She received a recent issue of
Kyrie Eleison comments of Bishop Richard Williamson titled
“Home Reading” (October 20, 2012). In it, he recommends parents
read selected chapters of the Poem of the Man-God to
children every night.
He admits the Poem is controversial and has many enemies,
but he defends Valtorta’s massive tome (4,000 pages in
10 volumes of supposed visions she received of the life of Christ).
The Bishop supports it, despite the objections he lists:
that it is riddled with doctrinal errors, that it humanizes
Our Lord Jesus Christ, and that the work was placed
on the Church’s Index of Forbidden Books in the 1950s.
He lightly dismisses all the arguments against it and concludes
children will learn much about Our Lord and Our Lady from the
Poem, which “will fortify a home.”
“I have not read this book,” my friend continues, “but, for
Heaven’s sake, why didn’t Bishop W. recommend reading the
wonderful, approved, written-by-a-canonized saint 4-volume
City of God by Mother Mary of Agreda? But that is beside the
point. I really do wish to know if you approve of the
Poem of the Man-God.
Even the title upsets my Catholic sensibilities.”
A humanized Christ
I believe my friend should follow her good Catholic sense.
The very title, the Man-God , expresses the spirit of the work.
It is Jesus as a man that Valtorta presents: a babe suckling
greedily at his Mother’s breasts, a youth hardly aware of Who He is,
a Man who laughs and jokes with His Apostles and is constantly
kissing them on the mouth and embracing them closely.
Yes, at the least, it is difficult not to suspect this showy Jesus
pictured in such way as having homosexual tendencies.
Valtorta’s natural approach is supposed to attract the modern man
to the Life of Christ. It is in tune with the progressivist doctrine
that tries to deny the supernatural and instead presents Our Lady
as a simple Jewish woman and focuses on Our Lord as being a man
“like us.” As Atila Guimaraes points out in Animus Injuriandi I,
the progressivist Church aims to de-mythify and
de-supernaturalize Christ and His Mother under the guise of presenting
a natural “historical” Christ and Mary.”
I believe Valtorta’s Jesus and Mary fit this mold.
whose life of Christ is presented from an elevated,
supernatural vantage point. One cannot help but wonder
why the traditionalist Bishop would not recommend these works,
instead of the Valtorta tomes, which were officially condemned
by the Holy Office and placed on the Index in December 1959
and defined by L’Osservatore Romano of January 6,1960
as “a badly fictionalized life of Jesus.”
After Vatican II, Paul VI abolished the Index of Forbidden Books,
and Valtorta’s supporters claim this nullifies the suppression of 1959.
Unfortunately, the official position of the Church today is less than clear,
with important Prelates and Catholic figures on both sides of the issue.
Obviously, the progressivists, almost to the man, defend it.
The Poem of the Man-God, I believe, is riddled with banalities,
vulgarities, blasphemies and even doctrinal errors. There are
endless idle conversations between Our Lord, Our Lady and the Apostles,
all on a natural level. I think the best way to confirm these points
is simply to cite some texts, which are so revolting that they
speak for themselves.
The quotes that follow are taken from an online edition of
The Poem of the Man-God. A 48-page critique written in the 1980s –
when the Poem’s popularity surged for a period, as it seems to be
resurging now – by a Salesian, Brother James, S.D.B.,
can be read in its entirety here.
An Infant conceived with original sin
Valtorta portrays the Christ Child as a greedy infant of a sentimental Mother.
It is difficult to find the respect we owe to Our Lord Jesus Christ
in this imaginary immodest description of a nursing scene:
The Man-God presents a naturalistic view of Our Lady and the Christ Child
|“Jesus opens His eyes, sees His Mother and smiles and |
stretches His little hands toward Her breast.
“[Mary] ‘Yes, love of Your Mummy. Yes. Your milk. Before the usual time.
But You are always ready to suck Your Mummy's breast,
My little holy Lamb!’
“Jesus laughs and plays, kicking His feet out of the blankets,
moving His arms happily in a typical childish style, so beautiful to see.
He pushes His feet against His Mummy's stomach. He arches His back
leaning His fair head on Her breast, and then throws Himself back and laughs,
holding with His hands the laces that tie Mary's dress to Her neck,
endeavoring to open it. …
“Mary nurses Him and Jesus avidly sucks His Mother's good milk,
and when He feels that only a little is coming from Her right breast,
He looks for the left one, laughing while doing so and looking up
at His Mother. Then He falls asleep again on Her breast,
His rosy round little cheek resting against Her white round breast.”
(Vol 1, n. 35, p. 106).
An Adult with homosexual tendencies
Valtorta’s Jesus suspiciously displays homosexual tendencies
since he is constantly kissing and embracing the Apostles.
When Jesus tells James of His approaching Passion, James
reacts with great emotion. Jesus comforts him thus:
“’Come, I will kiss you thus, to help you forget the burden of
My fate as Man. Here, I kiss your lips that will have to repeat
My words to the people of Israel and your heart that will have to
love as I told you, and there, on your temple, where life will cease.’
… They remain embraced for a long time and James seems
to doze off in the joy of God's kisses that make him forget
Recently beatified Gabriel Allegra, a Teilhard de Chardin colleague,
was a promoter of the Man-God Poem
When Valtorta describes the “favorite” Apostle John as having
the face of a young girl with the “gaze of a lover,” we can hardly
avoid having the impression that they have a homosexual relationship.
Here Jesus is kissing John to awaken him:
“Jesus bends and kisses the cheek of John, who opens his eyes
and is dumbfounded at seeing Jesus. He sits up and says,
‘Do you need me? Here I am.’ …
“John, half naked in his under-tunic, because he used his tunic
and mantle as bed covers, clasps Jesus’ neck and lays his
head between Jesus’ shoulder and cheek.”
After John professes his belief and love in Jesus as Son of God,
“he smiles and weeps, panting, inflamed by his love, relaxing
on Jesus’ chest, as if he were exhausted by his ardor.
And Jesus caresses him, burning with love Himself.”
John begs Jesus not to tell the others of what has passed between them.
Jesus replies, “Do not worry, John. No one will be aware of your wedding
with the Love. Get dressed, come. We must leave.” (Vol. 2, n. 165, pp. 57-58)
Jesus suggests a love-affair between St. Peter and Our Lady
Jesus even jokes with impropriety with his apostles. Here,
Jesus stands up and calls out loudly and angrily to Peter:
“‘Come here, you usurper and corrupter!’
“‘Me? Why? What have I done, Lord?’
“‘You have corrupted My Mother. That is why you wanted to be alone.
What shall I do with you?’
“Jesus smiles and Peter recovers his confidence.
‘You really frightened me! Now You are laughing.” (Vol. II, n. 199, p. 185)
Like Luther, Mary thinks: Let us sin to be forgiven
Some passages are tantamount to heresy. For example,
Valtorta presents the child Mary as expressing her desire to be a
big sinner in order to merit the grace of Redemption:
“[Mary]: ‘Tell Me, mummy, can one be a sinner out of love of God?
“[Anne]: ‘What are you saying, my dear? I don't understand you.’
“[Mary]:’I mean: to commit a sin in order to be loved by God, Who
becomes the Savior. Who is lost, is saved. Isn’t that so? I would like
to be saved by the Savior to receive His loving look." (Vol. 1, n. 7, p. 23).
A sensual Eve tending toward bestiality
The work is also not without doctrinal errors, such as when Valtorta
asserts the sin of Eve was not disobedience, but a sexual act.
There is also an insinuation of a tendency toward bestiality in Eve.
This erotic description was supposedly made by Jesus:
“With his venomous tongue Satan blandished and caressed Eve’s
limbs and eyes… Her flesh was aroused … The sensation is a
sweet one for her. And ‘she understood.’ Now Malice was inside her
and was gnawing at her intestines. She saw with new eyes and heard
with new ears the habits and voices of beasts. And she craved for
them with insane greed. “She began the sin by herself. She
accomplished it with her companion.” (Vol. 1, n. 17, p. 49)
These are some excerpts I offer to my readers to evaluate
Valtorta’s work. I believe they are sufficient for the reader to
make a judgment of the whole.
It is thus understandable that the Holy Office placed the work on
the Index of Forbidden Books, which is reproduced below. It is
also understandable that the Salesian Brother James concluded
his critique of the first two volumes with these words:
“Poem of the Man-God is so demonic that without a special grace
from Our Lord Jesus, we could be deceived by the seemingly
harmless statements by Valtorta’s Jesus, but they enclose
lies and heresy, contrary to the teachings of One, Holy Catholic Church.”
Supreme Congregation of
the Holy Office
Proscription of Books
Wednesday, December 16, 1959
Il Poema di Gesù [The Poem of Jesus] (Tipografia Editrice M. Pisani);
Il Poema dell'Uomo-Dio [The Poem of the Man-God], (Ibidem).
On Friday of that same month and year, the Most Holy and Dignified Lord John XXIII, Pope by the grace of Divine Providence, in an audience given to the Most Eminent and Reverend Cardinal Secretary of the Holy Office, after hearing the report of the Most Reverend Fathers, approved this resolution and commanded that it be published.
Given in Rome, in the seat of the
Holy Office on January 5, 1960.
Sebastian Masala, Notary
Posted October 29, 2012
… the International School of the Golden
. Rosycross, Malta
The Lectorium Rosicrucianum is a modern gnostic organization in the tradition of mystery schools, directing the true seeker towards the original, divine order.
June 12, 2013 - St. John of Facundo, Confessor
Independent Bishop Williamson Plans to Conduct His Second European Episcopal Visitation
From: The TRADITIO Fathers
Five Major Countries Are on His Itinerary to Win over Traditional Catholics from Fellay's Neo-SSPX
Independent Traditional Bishop Williamson Has Schedule a Second European Episcopal Visitation
He Will Visit Five Countries to Tell Them that Bernie Fellay's Neo-SSPX
"Is Little Short of Horrible"
He Will Inform These Countries of a New Option, the SSPX of the Strict Observance
An Organization Founded on Archbishop Lefebvre's Original Traditional Catholic Principles
Malta is a particularly interesting venue for a visitation. Malta had supported Benedict-Ratzinger, the Second Paedophile Newpope, who visited there in April 2010 when Ireland and several other major European countries turned down his request to visit because of his complicity in the paedophile crimes of his presbyters and Newbishops. He also caused a bit of a scandal there when he fell asleep in his Newpapal throne during his Novus Ordo Mess. His assistants had to poke him visibly in the ribs to get him back to earth.
Bishop Williamson's planned visitation has "horrified" the New Order sectarians in Malta, whose Newbishop, Pawlu Cremona, has forbidden even the Half Novus Ordo Vatican II Mess of 1962+ and has refused to accept any responsibility for the continued assault and rape of children in Malta by his Newchurch presbyters. Cremona has refused any compensation to the child victims, even when their rapists have been criminally convicted. Clearly, Malta needs a visit by a real bishop!
At the same time it has been announced that Bernie Fellay, the Superior-Dictator of the Neo-SSPX, has spent his Neo-SSPXers money to hire a Dutch marketing firm to help him "spin" his attempted sellout to the New Order sect. The Dutch firm has been hired to create a "brand" for Fellay's Neo-SSPX, just as deceptive Madison Avenue companies brand corporations to sell their goods. This is a technique that the sinking Novus Ordo religious orders have been using for years. Fellay has learned well from his Novus Ordo puppeteers. Except that Madison-Avenue branding hasn't worked for the Novus Ordo sect, and it won't work for Fellay either. His Neo-SSPX will continue disintegrating, even faster than before.
Originally the Dutch company refused the contract because, as it wrote Fellay: "You don't have a good name out there, and I don't want my company to have the blemish of having you as a customer." But the company, after a six-hour meeting with Fellay, was convinced to take the contract. It was said that Fellay offered "a bundle of money," perhaps flowing from Fellay's dozen corporations in Europe, co-managed by Fellay's partner, the Jewish fundraiser and Dresden lawyer, Maximilian Krah.
The Dutch branding company, after some months' analysis of the Neo-SSPX, concluded that Fellay really looked bad when he continued to fight Newchurch of the New Order, that Fellay looked cruel. The company, therefore, recommended that Fellay must stop fighting the New Order. That is why already Fellay's Neo-SSPX web sites, his Neo-SSPX Angelus, and other Neo-SSPX organs have given up the fight against the Modernist Vatican II Council and the invalid New Mess. As one priest who recently left Fellay and his pseudo-traditionalistic Neo-SSPX wrote: "It seems to me that the Society has become a blunt sword in the hands of the Lord. There is no cutting edge anymore, it is useless!"
The Justice of God: "Bishop" Williamson, Rosicrucian Freemason decoy and Buddhists, Muslims, Yoruba join antipope for peace
Bishop Williamson: a decoy
Bishop Williamson - Part No. 8 - The (former?) Anglican Bishop 'Rose' of the Brotherhood, imposed in the middle of the SSPX, Derek Holland, an activist of the "new right" heathen Anglo-Saxon, an admirer of Gaddafi and Khomeini
Release of March 10, 2010
In the VM , we give biographical information of the activist Derek Holland , promoted and protected by British Bishop Williamson .
Bishop Williamson - Part No. 7 - The Bishop 'Rose' imposed and protected in the journal of the SSPX in the United States, and against the advice of Father Scott, a neo-fascist military activist naturalist Mr J. Forrest Sharpe
Publication of the January 24, 2010
The Abbot Scott wanted to oppose the entryism of John Sharpe in the magazine The Angelus(equivalent Fideliter for the SSPX in the U.S.) and accused the military of being "fallen into naturalism and of betraying the Catholic Faith" . But nothing is done, despite the termination ofMr Sharpe 's Scott Abbot , Bishop Fellay did not support and left to the British bishop, Bishop Williamson'Cunctator-' , the former (?)-Anglican "Rose" of the Fraternity. On the contrary, theFather Scott was dismissed by Bishop Fellay of the Director of the Seminary of the Holy Cross in Australia, in summer 2008 and was sent to Canada in a job that removes it from any liability .
Williamson's mother, follower of the Gnostic sect Protestant " Christian Science " , the religion of Milner Group ( Round Table British Rothschild clan-related), head of the vast Empire Victorian and historical matrix of globalism current Anglo-Saxon
Release of May 19, 2009
Bishop Williamson in London: the return of Bishop Rose of the fraternity to the parent British Fabians in?
Release of May 18, 2009
The destruction of the SSPX in the U.S. in 1983 by the abbots and Williamson Schmidberger
Release of February 28, 2009
-  The 'Nine' against Mgr. Lefebvre - 2008 - Download in PDF
-  Letter of 'Nine' to Archbishop Lefebvre - 1983 - Download in PDF
Williamson and Father Ramon Angles rallied helped to discredit the SSPX in the U.S.
Release of February 26, 2009
-  File Ecclesia Dei Fidelity (French) - 1992 - Download in PDF
- APPENDIX A - FIDELITY ARTICLE - The Society of Saint Pius X is sick (the article that set fire to the powder, Oct 1992) by Thomas W. Case (October 1992)
- APPENDIX B - Letter - Fidelity Magazine - December 1992 - These letters were written in response to the article by Fidelity released in October 1992 under the title "The Society of St. Pius X gets sick." Among these letters are responses abbots Ramon Angles , Principal of the College and Academy St. Mary and Peter Scott , District Superior of the United States for the Society of St. Pius X. Between Mr Case and other faithful respond point by point to the letters, by providing additional facts.
Bishop Williamson: the "bin Laden" Rose of the SSPX
Release of February 22, 2009
- SCOOP - The father of Bishop Williamson Rose is Anglican pastor
Release of February 22, 2009
Why Bishop Fellay insists there to protect Bishop Williamson ?
Release of February 10, 2009
The Vatican is flying to the aid of Bishop Williamson by spreading the false rumor that he was "dying of cancer"
Publication of a st February 2009
Bishop Williamson (SSPX) hosted and directed a pederast priest, Father Roberts
Publication of the January 23, 2009
Twist! Bishop Williamson now recognizes the infiltration of the SSPX
Publication of the December 31, 2008
The Justice of God: The Apocalypse, the Book of the Revelation: 18. - The Complete Apostasy and fall into absolute Satanic decadence and Fall of Rome-the Vatican and its total destruction by the command of God Almighty
Father Lauriers rightfully condemns Msgr. Lefebvre's retreat from the truth.
Fr. Guérard des Lauriers to Msgr. Lefèbvre: ‘You Act like Pontius Pilate’
After Vatican II, Fr. Michel Louis Guérard des Lauriers, O.P. (1898 - 1988) was very concerned about the events taking place in the Church. In 1969 he was the primary ghost-writer who authored the famous [see link] Ottaviani Intervention, criticizing the new Mass. [also see: The Ottaviani Intervention: A Critical Study of the New Mass]
You were clear in your letter about the outlines of a protocol of agreement between Ecône and Rome: Ecône, which up until now we support; Rome, which we resist, just as you do.
The loyalty demanded by the service of the Truth obliges us to declare: We do not want this peace. It appears to be wise. It is, indeed, no more wise than Pilate pretended to be. Jesus was delivered to Pilate because He was accused of saying: “I am the King of the Jews” (John 19:21), whereas the Jews claimed to “have no other king than Cesar” (John 19: 15).
In reality, Jesus was not brought before Pilate for a royalty “whose origin is not of this world” (John 18: 36). And Jesus did not mean to die to conserve anything. He did not mean to die for anything except to “give testimony to the Truth” (John 14:6); regardless of appearances, it was Pilate who depended on Jesus rather than Jesus on Pilate. Your Excellency, you submit the Mass to the Pope because it disturbs the celebration of the “new mass” (as Paul VI called it), just as Jesus disturbed the Pharisaic order “by teaching throughout all Judea” (Luke 23:5).
IN REALITY, THE MASS SHOULD NOT BE SUBMITTED TO THE POPE, since the Pope must respect it. We want, with God’s grace, to testify to the Truth; we do not want a peace that “diminishes the Truth” (Psalm 11:2).
Your Excellency, you have recourse to the Pope to conserve the Mass. And you admit that there can be in the Church - inevitably in the same Church - the Mass that is THE MASS and the “new mass.” And you believe that “unity would be restored immediately at the level of the local Bishops.”
Thus, the unity of the Church would no longer be the radiation of the unique Sacrifice “that Christ commanded from His beloved Spouse”! The unity would no longer be that of “the heavenly Jerusalem that is free and is our mother” (Gal 4: 26). Unity would find itself degraded into a juxtaposition made under the iron fist of an unconditional authority. This is a parody of unity! It is a sacrilege against unity! Archbishop, we do not want this peace or this unity, which would be against the Truth, against the sanctity of the Church, against the Liberty that comes only from the Spirit of Truth. To “save” Jesus, Pilate put Him on par with Barabbas (Marl 15: 9). How could Pilate, mocking the Justice that he should represent, imagine that a changeable mob would impose justice on their [Pharisee] leaders? Pilate could only wash his hands (Mat 27: 24).
Your Excellency, in order to save the Mass that is the Mass, you put it on par with the “new mass,” in the name of the Religion that you profess. How can you imagine that, instructed by your example, those unstable and weak people who follow you rather than the Truth could restore the sense of the true Religion in a Church occupied by the “high priests” of the god of the Universe? One cannot sit at the same table with Satan. It is Hell that is paved with these good intentions that justify the means by their end, perpetrating a manifest evil under the illusion of doing a good.
Your Excellency, if there were to be in the Church - God forbid - as you desire the Mass that is THE MASS and the “new mass,” the shrewd polls made about [the preferences of] the “people of God,” duly manipulated, would transform the Mass of the minority into a mockery. The only result would be that the broad sacrilegious practice [of the Consecrations in the “new mass”], but actually deprived of object [because these Consecrations actually do not take place], would have all their blasphemous character now effective against the [true] Real Presence. Have you considered this? Should the price of this false security, founded on the illusion of an unconditional submission to those who did all they could to destroy the Church, be to inflict on the Crucified Christ the blows of the most insolent flagellation ever?
Your Excellency, we do not want this peace that would be laden with so many sins. It falls to us, to us and not to the Crucified Christ, “to complete” [by this accord] what would be lacking in this flagellation without us. Archbishop, your protocol of peace gives the final blow to a trust that we no longer can have in you, regarding both the question of the Mass and that of “authority.”
How Msgr. Lefebvre changed Masses
You have celebrated the “new mass” since the beginning of April 1969 until December 24, 1970.
To those same friends, who, encouraged by you, were working to write the text that became the Letter of Cardinals Ottaviani and Bacci, you gave comforting assurances: “We will have 600 Bishops [to sign this letter].” This would be enough to move the Pope! Instead, there was not one single Bishop, not even yourself.
As a matter of fact, you were more concerned about “not giving scandal” than about defending the Truth. We fear that your letter n. 16 [to friends and benefactors] reveals that you did not change.
You continued to celebrate the “new mass” both at Fribourg and Ecône. The first hopes, nonetheless, started to appear: Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, Paul Aulagnier, Bernard Waltz, and three others. On December 24, 1969, at the end of the noon meal, the Dominican priest who signs these lines, then staying at Ecône, with respectful irony said this to you:
“Monsignor, it is a pity that, while supporting Tradition, you celebrate the ‘new mass,’ which is not the Mass of the Tradition.” This simple observation literally set fire to the gunpowder. The “six,” all your living hope, exploded. Each one in his way and all together posed the same question to you: How is it possible to base fidelity to Tradition upon a “mass” that was “innovated” against Tradition? That incident was very vehement and, by the way, quickly closed. Still, be it by some coincidence due to the action of the Holy Ghost along with an interior movement on your part, the fact is that on December 24, 1970 at the midnight Mass, you returned to saying the Mass according to rite promulgated by St. Pius V, to the great joy of all present.
Probably you followed the Holy Ghost. But, alas, everything has happened as if you were following your grassroots. Thenceforth you have followed the same tactic. If you would not have supported the Traditional Mass, the seminary of Ecône would have been deprived of its end, and those who supported you would have felt the obligation to abandon you.
Suspicions of other doctrinal concessions to Progressivism
Nonetheless, you have never made a serious doctrinal study of the “new mass.” You affirm it is valid without justifying it. And you have issued “norms” [on how to behave regarding it] from which many of the faithful, or even Ecône seminarians, can deduce whatever they want. And now - all this is unhappily too coherent - you admit that the Mass and the mass can exist together in the Church. This is “ecumenism” inside the Church, the paroxysm of a false ecumenism that replaces with a deceitful union the true unity, which is the unconditional submission to the Liberty inspired by the Truth.
Why do you refuse to enunciate clearly, on the “authority” the principles that unavoidably explain your judicious accusations? Instead, as a supposed counter-attack, you imitate the [blind] false prophets who “lead each other into the pit” (Matt 15:14), by announcing a false peace followed by a false prosperity! We must either speak or be silent. But we cannot not proclaim the error and silence the truth. It is with profound sorrow, believe me Your Excellency, that we are obliged in conscience to remind you of this.
We can no longer trust you. We are not “against you,” we are still “for you,” but we can no longer “be with you.” You count on saving everything through the SSPX; the whole Church, certainly, will be thankful to you for what you have done. But, Your Excellency, you promise too much to be true. Do you remember the promise of the 600 Bishops that never materialized? Remember that when on that “May 5, 1975 you acted firmly no matter what [against Rome],” it was because you opposed those whom today you think you can trust, those whose victim you have become since you are following them.
Your Excellency, we can no longer “be with you.” We are only “unconditional” with regard to the Truth!
Holy Thursday April 12, 1979
M.L. Guérard des Lauriers, O.P.
In memory of a group of the faithful attached to Tradition
Holy Thursday, April 3, 1969 - The magazine Sodalitium reminds us
that April 3, 1969 was the date of the promulgation of the New Mass,
opposed publicly by Fr. des Lauriers in his Brief Critical Study
Apostasy: The Apostasy of the Vatican
The agreed upon ancient canons of the Church
As long as the agreed upon ancient canons of the Church were upheld there was a Catholicity to the Vatican. The process to end that began at the 1958 conclave and the final blow to any Catholicity of the Vatican occurred at the Assisi pagan gatherings where a new = a counterfeit 'gospel,' a false gospel of bringing exactly what is the base for the Antichrist to appear was revealed to a corrupt and vile world, instead of salvation. We are to come out from among them OR BE DAMNED WITH THEM.
THE APOCALYPSE OF ST. JOHN THE APOSTLE AND EVANGELIST
Revelation, Chapter 18
1 … Scripture reference – Rev.: 10:1; Ezek.: 43:2
2 … Scripture reference – Rev.: 14:8!; Isaiah: 13:21, 22!
3 … Scripture reference – Rev.: 14:8; 17:2; Jer.: 51:7!; Rev.: 18:9, 15
4 … Scripture reference – Jer.: 51:45!; 2 Cor.: 6:17!; Eph.: 5:7!; 1 Tim.: 5:22
5 … Scripture reference – Jer.: 51:9
6 … Scripture reference – Jer.: 50:29!; 2 Thess.: 1:6
7 … Scripture reference – Isaiah: 47:8
8 … Scripture reference –
9 … Scripture reference – Rev.: 18:3; 17:2; 18:18
10 … Scripture reference – Rev.: 18:15, 16, 17
11 … Scripture reference – Ezek.: 27;32!
12 … Scripture reference –
13 … Scripture reference –
14 … Scripture reference –
15 … Scripture reference – Rev.: 18:3, 10
16 … Scripture reference – Rev.: 17:4
17 … Scripture reference – Ezek.: 27:29, 30!; Rev.: 18:10
18 … Scripture reference – Ezek.: 27:29, 30!; Rev.: 18:9
19 … Scripture reference – Ezek.: 27:29, 30!, 32, 33!
20 … Scripture reference – Rev.: 12:12
21 … Scripture reference – Jer.: 51:63, 64
22 … Scripture reference – Ezek.:26:13!; Jer.: 25:10!
23 … Scripture reference – Jer.: 25:10!
24 … Scripture reference – Rev.: 16:6!
The Fall of Babylon
1 ¶ And after these things, I saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power: and the earth was enlightened with his glory. … Scripture reference – Rev.: 10:1; Ezek.: 43:2
2 And he cried out with a strong voice, saying: Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen: and is become the habitation of devils and the hold of every unclean spirit and the hold of every unclean and hateful bird: … Scripture reference – Rev.: 14:8!; Isaiah: 13:21, 22!
3 Because all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication: and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her; And the merchants of the earth have been made rich by the power of her delicacies. … Scripture reference – Rev.: 14:8; 17:2; Jer.: 51:7!; Rev.: 18:9, 15
Her Sins and Punishment
4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying: Go out from her, my people; that you be not partakers of her sins and that you receive not of her plagues. … Scripture reference – Jer.: 51:45!; 2 Cor.: 6:17!; Eph.: 5:7!; 1 Tim.: 5:22
5 For her sins have reached unto heaven: and the Lord hath remembered her iniquities. … Scripture reference – Jer.: 51:9
6 Render to her as she also hath rendered to you: and double unto her double, according to her works. In the cup wherein she hath mingled, mingle ye double unto her. … Scripture reference – Jer.: 50:29!; 2 Thess.: 1:6
7 As much as she hath glorified herself and lived in delicacies, so much torment and sorrow give ye to her. Because she saith in her heart: I sit a queen and am no widow: and sorrow I shall not see. … Scripture reference – Isaiah: 47:8
8 Therefore, shall her plagues come in one day, death and mourning and famine. And she shall be burnt with the fire: because God is strong, who shall judge her.
Dirge of the Kings
9 ¶  And the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication and lived in delicacies with her, shall weep and bewail themselves over her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning: … Scripture reference – Rev.: 18:3; 17:2; 18:18
10 Standing afar off for fear of her torments, saying: Alas! alas! that great city, Babylon, that mighty city: for in one hour is thy judgment come. … Scripture reference – Rev.: 18:15, 16, 17
Dirge of the Merchants
11 And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her: for no man shall buy their merchandise any more. … Scripture reference – Ezek.: 27;32!
12 Merchandise of gold and silver and precious stones: and of pearls and fine linen and purple and silk and scarlet: and all thyine wood: and all manner of vessels of ivory: and all manner of vessels of precious stone and of brass and of iron and of marble:
13 And cinnamon and odours and ointment and frankincense and wine and oil and fine flour and wheat and beasts  and sheep and horses and chariots: and slaves and souls of men.
14 And the fruits of the desire of thy soul are departed from thee: and all fat and goodly things are perished from thee. And they shall find them no more at all.
15 The merchants of these things, who were made rich, shall stand afar off from her, for fear of her torments, weeping and mourning, … Scripture reference – Rev.: 18:3, 10
16 And saying: Alas! alas! that great city, which was clothed with fine linen and purple and scarlet and was gilt with gold and precious stones and pearls. … Scripture reference – Rev.: 17:4
17 For in one hour are so great riches come to nought.
Dirge of the Mariners
And every shipmaster and all that sail into the lake, and mariners, and as many as work in the sea, stood afar off, … Scripture reference – Ezek.: 27:29, 30!; Rev.: 18:10
18 And cried, seeing the place of her burning, saying: What city is like to this great city? … Scripture reference – Ezek.: 27:29, 30!; Rev.: 18:9
19 And they cast dust upon their heads and cried, weeping and mourning, saying: Alas! alas! that great city, wherein all were made rich, that had ships at sea, by reason of her prices. For, in one hour she is made desolate. … Scripture reference – Ezek.: 27:29, 30!, 32, 33!
20 Rejoice over her, thou heaven and ye holy apostles and prophets. For God hath judged your judgment on her. … Scripture reference – Rev.: 12:12
The Angel’s Promise
21 And a mighty angel took up a stone, as it were a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying: With such violence as this, shall Babylon, that great city, be thrown down and shall be found no more at all. … Scripture reference – Jer.: 51:63, 64
22 And the voice of harpers and of musicians and of them that play on the pipe and on the trumpet shall no more be heard at all in thee: and no craftsman  of any art whatsoever shall be found any more at all in thee: and the sound of the mill shall be heard no more at all in thee: … Scripture reference – Ezek.:26:13!; Jer.: 25:10!
23 And the light of the lamp shall shine no more at all in thee: and the voice of the bridegroom and the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee. For thy merchants were the great men of the earth: for all nations have been deceived by thy enchantments. … Scripture reference – Jer.: 25:10!
24 And in her was found the blood of prophets and of saints and of all that were slain upon the earth. … Scripture reference – Rev.: 16:6!
 -Ver. 9-19. This passage is not an account of a vision but rather a direct prophecy, after. the manner of the prophecies of Isaias and Ezechiel concerning Tyre. Tyre furnishes a type of the vengeance of God upon satanic pride and luxury.
 -Ver.13. Beasts [of burden]: the Greek has “cattle.”
 –Ver. 22 The city had boasted previously of her craftsmen, skilled in every craft.
Second Epistle Of Saint Paul To The Thessalonians, Chapter 2
verse 10 And in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish; because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying:
- that is what occurred here:
Diabolic Apostasy of the Assisi Pan Religion Interreligious Non-Catholic Non-Christian Pagan Revelry
We are to remain with the ancient truths - NOTHING ELSE.As in the below -
The Unity of God is maintained against heresy saying otherwise or preaching modalism
BEWARE The Synagogue of Satan and The Name and Number of the beast.
The heresy of the "priesthood" over the "laity"
There are three most heinous heresies. They are anathema.